To be updated shortly.
| 2025 - 2027 | Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig (Germany) | Post-doctoral researcher |
| 2023 - 2025 | Technical University Chemnitz (Germany) with funding from the DFG | Post-doctoral researcher |
| 2021 - 2023 | Technical University Chemnitz (Germany) | Post-doctoral researcher |
| 2021 | Laboratoire de Mathématiques de Versailles (France) | LMS Early Career Fellow |
| 2017 - 2021 | University of Kent, Canterbury (United Kingdom) | PhD student |
| 2014 - 2017 | University of Amsterdam (the Netherlands) | MSc Mathematics MSc Theoretical Physics |
| 2011 - 2014 | University of Amsterdam (the Netherlands) | BSc Mathematics BSc Physics & Astronomy |
My current research concerns mirror symmetry for (quasi-)cominuscule homogeneous spaces.
I consider mirror symmetry on the level of the (small) quantum cohomology of a variety. This is a modification of the cohomology ring by replacing the cup product with the so-called quantum product whose structure constants are given by Gromov-Witten invariants. These invariants can be considered to count the number of rational curves between three given subvarieties. Homogeneous spaces are projective varieties that can be realized as the quotient of a (complex) Lie or linear algebraic group. For these spaces, the quantum cohomology can be constructed [Rietsch] as the coordinate ring of a so-called mirror variety modulo relations obtained from the derivatives of a function called the superpotential. Such a pair of mirror variety and superpotential modeling the quantum cohomology of a variety is called a Landau-Ginzburg (LG) model.
To obtain a better geometric understanding of Rietsch's mostly Lie-theoretic LG model, this construction has been worked out in the specific cases of Grassmannians [Marsh-Rietsch], quadrics [Pech-Rietsch-Williams] and Lagrangian Grassmannians [Pech-Rietsch]. These examples of homogeneous spaces share the common property that they are cominuscule homogeneous spaces; this property greatly simplifies the relevant representation-theoretic structures. In particular, as a corollary of the geometric Satake correspondence, there is a natural identification of a basis of the cohomology these cominuscule spaces with a set of projective coordinates called (generalized) Plücker coordinates on their mirror varieties.
I have constructed a type-independent local Laurent polynomial expression for Rietsch’s potential in the cases of cominuscule homogeneous spaces, published in Transformation Groups (see DOI:10.1007/s00031-020-09636-07; see also arXiv:1912.09122). I have been working with Prof Nicolas Perrin to extend these results to adjoint homogeneous spaces, which form the second class of quasi-cominuscule spaces after the cominuscule cases.
I have also investigated Rietsch’s construction for the exceptional cominuscule family, i.e. the Cayley plane of type E6 and the Freudenthal variety of type E7, and I have derived generalized Plücker coordinate expressions for the mirror models. In collaboration with Charles Wang, we have also found cluster structures for the mirror varieties of the exceptional family. These results are published in the Journal of Algebra (see DOI:10.1016/j/j.jalgebra.2023.03.039; see also arXiv:2204.03548).
Inspired by the methods used for the exceptional family, Charles Wang and I continued to investigate these Plücker coordinate LG models. In our recent preprint (see arXiv:2410.05070), we used the combinatorics of minuscule posets to obtain a type-independent generalization. We found that the superpotential is closely related to the anticanonical divisor determined by the frozen cluster variables in the cluster structure of the mirror varieties. Moreover, the mirror variety and superpotential can be determined fully combinatorially using Dynkin diagram symmetries and order ideals of the minuscule poset. As an early-stage announcement of this result, we applied our type-independent methods on the maximal orthogonal Grassmannians parametrizing maximal orthogonal subspaces in a complex inner product space (see DOI:10.1007/978-981-97-6453-2_27; see also arXiv:2312.17656).
Recently, I have started considering mirror symmetry statements on the level of D-modules for homogeneous spaces. Results for minuscule homogeneous spaces [Lam-Templier] and partial results for quadrics [Pech-Rietsch-Williams] are available. Together with Prof Christian Sevenheck and Dr Yichen Qin, we will be considering further implications of these findings.
Although not part of my current research, I am interested in the broader aspects of mirror symmetry and algebraic groups, including topics as tropical geometry, the geometric Langlands corrrespondence, derived categories, and string theory.
Coming soon
In this module, we will introduce the concept of Lie algebras. These are a special type of algebras (i.e. vector spaces with a compatible ring structure) whose products are anti-commutative and satisfy the Jacobi identity.
Lie algebras were first introduced by Marius Sophus Lie in the 1870s (and independently by Wilhelm Killing in 1880s) in the study of differential equations with symmetries. They arose from considering infinitessimally small actions of (smooth) symmetry groups on these systems. Analogously, imposing symmetry conditions on other problems naturally lead to applications of the theory of Lie algebras in these areas. Moreover, Lie algebras arise naturally in many contexts, such as differential geometry and quantum mechanics.
Another large part of their significance is the ‘‘classifiability’’ of the theory: finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebras can be decomposed into simple parts that cannot be divided further (similar to ‘‘irreducibility’’ in representation theory), and these simple parts belong to a finite number of families. This in turn allows applications to be reduced to more tractable cases and solved there.
An important role in the classification of simple Lie algebras is played by reflection groups. These groups generalize the well-known examples of finite groups such as the dihedral groups: a group generated by reflections. Finite reflection groups are determined by their root systems and turn out to allow a description as finite Coxeter groups. These have a succinct description in terms of Coxeter graphs that allow an easy classification. We then discuss the special case of Weyl groups whose root systems are crystallographic and determine the classification of simple Lie algebras.
This course will consist of three parts, following two books by J.E. Humphreys, namely Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory and Reflection groups and Coxeter groups. Purchasing these books is not required, there will be lecture notes available on the OPAL page.
In the first part, which will most likely consist of the first half of the course, we will start with the basics of Lie algebras. Specifically, we will work through Chapters I and II of the Lie algebras book. Topics will include:
In the second part, we will move to (finite) reflection groups, Coxeter groups, Weyl groups and their respective classifications. This part replace part III of the Lie Algebras book with the more general general discussion in the Reflection groups textbook. Specifically we will work through Sections 1 and 2 of Chapter I, which will approximately take up another quarter of the course. We will discuss:
In the third and final part, spanning the final quarter of the course, we will use the Dynkin diagrams of the roots of the adjoint representation to classify semisimple Lie algebras. This part will return to the Lie algebras textbook, namely Chapters IV and and V. We will most likely not have sufficient time to go into full detail of the proof, but we will introduce the most important concepts and try to sketch the arguments of the existence and uniqueness statements for semisimple Lie algebras. In particular, we will see:
Prerequisites for the module: The theory of Lie algebras is mostly self-contained, however a good understanding of linear algebra is required. Basic knowledge of algebra will be helpful for the course.
Any knowledge of differential systems or physics is not required, but might help motivate the theory.
In this module, we will introduce the concept of Lie algebras. These are a special type of algebras (i.e. vector spaces with a compatible ring structure) whose products are anti-commutative and satisfy the Jacobi identity.
Lie algebras were first introduced by Marius Sophus Lie in the 1870s (and independently by Wilhelm Killing in 1880s) in the study of differential equations with symmetries. They arose from considering infinitessimally small actions of (smooth) symmetry groups on these systems. Analogously, imposing symmetry conditions on other problems naturally lead to applications of the theory of Lie algebras in these areas. Moreover, Lie algebras arise naturally in many contexts, such as differential geometry and quantum mechanics.
Another large part of their significance is the ‘‘classifiability’’ of the theory: finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebras can be decomposed into simple (think ‘‘irreducible’’) parts, and these simple parts belong to a finite number of families. This in turn allows applications to be reduced to more tractable cases and solved there.
This course will consist of two parts:
In the first, which will most likely consist of two-thirds of the course, we will follow the textbook Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory by J.E. Humphreys. Specifically, we will work through Chapters I to V and parts of Chapter VI. Topics will include:
In the last third of the course, there is a flexibility in the choice of further topics to discuss, depending on the interests and knowledge of the students. Possible topics include:
Prerequisites for the module: The theory of Lie algebras is mostly self-contained, however a good understanding of linear algebra is required. Basic knowledge of algebra will be helpful for the course.
Any knowledge of differential systems or physics is not required, but might help motivate the theory.